Organisation Name
US Chamber of Commerce
InfluenceMap Query
Climate Science Stance
Data Source
Social Media
 
 

Score for this Data / Query Cell

-0.87

InfluenceMap has researched and collated the following pieces of evidence associated with the data source and query indicated above. Extraordinary information is indicated by a coloured flag in the upper right corner. Evidence items in order of data inputted with exceptional items first.

 

Partially consistent with IPCC need for drastic action

InfluenceMap Comment:

Supporting GHG emissions reductions. Not placing GHG emissions reductions within clearly defined time-frame. (Twitter, September 2014)

Extract from Source:

@USChamberAction: #EPA head: No need to fear hurting #economy in battle against #climatechange >> http://bit.ly/1sxA1Ru (Links to: 'EPA head: No need to fear hurting economy in battle against climate change, McClatchyDC) 'The issue now is climate change, and McCarthy said the U.S. can’t back away from taking a leadership role. That’s despite worries it will harm the U.S. economy, and despite concerns the U.S. is getting ahead of other nations. She said the urgency of the situation required action now. “When it comes to climate change, the most expensive thing we could do, is to do nothing. We no longer project tomorrow’s impacts, we tally up today’s damages,”[...] The bottom line is: We don't act despite the economy, we act because of it.”'

Created: 26/07/2015 Last edited: 02/01/2018

 

Not fully supporting IPCC need for drastic action

InfluenceMap Comment:

Emphasizing the opportunity cost of reducing GHG emissions (US Chamber of Commerce, Above the Fold, September 2014)

Extract from Source:

EPA staffers recommended a lower standard despite ozone levels declining by 25% over the last three decades. If the standard is set to 60 ppb, "94% of the population would live in places out of compliance and subject to new emission reductions requirements," according to the American Petroleum Institute. For example, the entire state of Louisiana would be non-compliant as would nearly all of Nevada. Non-compliant areas would be subject to emission reduction requirements that, according to Mary Martin, Energy, Clean Air and Natural Resources Policy counsel for the U.S. Chamber, will stymie economic development [...] On a national level, lowering ozone levels will be one of the costliest regulations ever. EPA's own estimate found that complying with a standard of 60 ppb to 70 ppb would cost as much as $90 billion annually.

Created: 02/09/2015 Last edited: 02/01/2018

 

Not fully supporting IPCC need for drastic action

InfluenceMap Comment:

Supporting US effort to reduce emissions with major exceptions - supporting less ambition emission reduction pathway in US Clean Power Plan's replacement (US Chamber, Press Release, August 2018)

Extract from Source:

“The Chamber believes that the global climate is changing, and that human activities contribute to those changes. At the same time, the Chamber has long maintained that there is a better way to address carbon dioxide emissions than the Clean Power Plan regulation, which was halted by the Supreme Court in 2016.  Today’s announcement is an important step toward a more collaborative process that fits within EPA’s statutory authority and will result in achievable progress through more practical, state-driven programs.  This revised approach will help continue the trend of lower electric power sector emissions while preserving America’s energy edge and respecting environmental law.  We look forward to reviewing the proposal in detail and actively participating in the regulatory process.

Created: 04/11/2018 Last edited: 04/11/2018