Climate Change

Procter & Gamble

InfluenceMap Score
D-
Performance Band
50%
Organisation Score
27%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Consumer Staples
Head​quarters:
Cincinnati, United States
Brands and Associated Companies
Gillette, Duracell, Braun, Pampers
Official Web Site:

Procter & Gamble appear to have relatively limited but negative engagement with climate change regulation. Through the National Environmental Development Association’s Clean Air Project, they seem to have opposed the EPA Clean Power Plan in consultation and in legal action in 2014. In addition, senior executives are board members of CEFIC and the National Association of Manufacturing and P&G are also direct members of Business Europe and the Business Roundtable. All of these organizations appear to be actively opposing climate change policy.

QUESTIONS SOURCES Main Web Site Social Media CDP Responses Legislative Consultations Media Reports CEO Messaging Financial Disclosures EU Register
Climate Science Transparency 2 NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Climate Science Stance NS 2 NA NS 1 NS NS NA
Need for climate regulations NS NS 0 NS NS NS 0 NA
UN Treaty Support NS 1 NA NS NS NS NS NA
Transparency on Legislation -2 NA -2 NA NA NA NS 0
Carbon Tax NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Emissions Trading NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Energy Efficiency Standards NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Renewable Energy Legislation 0 NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Energy Policy and Mix NS 1 NS NS NS NS NS NA
GHG Emission Standards NS NS NS -2 -2 NS NS NA
Disclosure on Relationships 1 NS -1 NA NA NA NS 1
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
30%
 
30%
 
17%
 
17%
 
29%
 
29%
 
30%
 
30%
 
32%
 
32%
 
29%
 
29%
 
43%
 
43%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.