Climate Change

Phillips 66

InfluenceMap Score
F
Performance Band
20%
Organisation Score
22%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Energy
Head​quarters:
Houston, United States
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Phillips 66 appear to have a generally obstructive engagement with strands of climate change regulations. It does not appear to have a clear position on the science of climate change or reducing GHG emissions in line with IPCC recommendations. It has also reportedly funded others to oppose cap and trade legislation in California in 2014. In their disclosures to investors, it appears not to support emissions trading, renewable fuel standards, automotive GHG emissions standards, or the decarbonization of transportation. In 2014 it also appears to have opposed the EPA Clean Power Plan in consultation, through the organization NEDA/CAP. Senior executives of Phillips 66 are board members of the National Association of Manufacturing and the US Chamber of Commerce, while Phillips 66’s CEO, Greg Garland, is on the American Chemistry Council's Board of Directors; trade associations that appear to be opposing numerous strands of climate change policy in the US.

QUESTIONS SOURCES Main Web Site Social Media CDP Responses Legislative Consultations Media Reports CEO Messaging Financial Disclosures EU Register
Climate Science Transparency NS NS NA NS NS NS 0 NA
Climate Science Stance -1 NS NA NS NS NS -1 NA
Need for climate regulations NS NS NS NS NS NS 0 NA
UN Treaty Support NS NS NA NS NS NS NS NA
Transparency on Legislation -2 NA NA NA NA NA NS NA
Carbon Tax NS NS NA NS NS NS NS NA
Emissions Trading NS NS NA NS -2 NS -1 NA
Energy Efficiency Standards NS NS NA NS NS NS NS NA
Renewable Energy Legislation NS NS NA NS NS NS -1 NA
Energy Policy and Mix -1 NS NA NS NS NS -1 NA
GHG Emission Standards NS NS NA -2 -2 NS -1 NA
Disclosure on Relationships -2 NS NA NA NA NA NS NA
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
42%
 
16%
 
16%
 
13%
 
27%
 
20%
 
26%
 
30%
 
35%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.