Phillips 66

InfluenceMap Score
F
Performance Band
21%
Organisation Score
26%
Relationship Score
Modifications to InfluenceMap Scoring
Sector:
Energy
Head​quarters:
Houston, United States
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Phillips 66 appears to be positioned in opposition to climate change policy and regulation. The company has not disclosed a clear position on the science of climate change or the need to reduce GHG emissions in line with IPCC recommendations. In 2018, Phillips 66 made political contributions totalling over $7 million to the 'No on 1631 campaign' which opposed the introduction of a carbon tax in Washington State. Phillips 66 does not appear to be supporting a transition towards a low-carbon economy, suggesting on its website that high GHG emission energy sources are desirable in a the energy mix 'for the foreseeable future'. Senior executives of Phillips 66 are board members of the National Association of Manufacturing and the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers while Phillips 66’s CEO, Greg Garland, is on the board and executive committee of the American Petroleum Institute. These trade associations are actively opposing numerous strands of climate change policy in the US.

QUESTIONS SOURCES Main Web Site Social Media CDP Responses Legislative Consultations Media Reports CEO Messaging Financial Disclosures EU Register
Climate Science Transparency NS NS NA NS NS NS 0 NA
Climate Science Stance -1 NS NA NS NS NS NS NA
Need for Climate Regulation NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
UN Treaty Support NS NS NA NS NS NS 0 NA
Transparency on Legislation -2 NA NA NA NA NA NS NA
Carbon Tax NS NS NA -2 -2 NS NS NA
Emissions Trading NS NS NA NS NS NS -1 NA
Energy Efficiency Standards NS NS NA NS NS NS NS NA
Renewable Energy Legislation NS NS NA -1 NS NS NS NA
Energy Policy and Mix -1 NS NA NS NS NS -1 NA
GHG Emission Standards NS NS NA -2 -2 NS -1 NA
Disclosure on Relationships 0 NS NA NA NA NA NS NA
Climate Lobbying Governance NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
17%
 
17%
 
18%
 
18%
 
37%
 
37%
 
18%
 
18%
 
19%
 
19%
 
42%
 
42%
 
41%
 
41%
 
25%
 
25%
 
28%
 
28%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.