Nestlé
What do our scores mean?
The organizational score represents the degree to which the organization influencing climate policy and legislation. Corporations also have relationship scores reflecting their links with influencers like trade associations. Both are combined to place the corporation in a performance band. Full details can be found here.
Update August 2021: If limited evidence had been collected either on a company's direct policy engagement (Organization Score) or industry association links (Relationship Score) this is signified with an ‘n/a’ (not available). If limited evidence has been collected in both areas, the Total Score is also given as n/a. Full details and links back to any primary evidence that has been collected can still be located on the company’s profile.
Engagement Intensity
The engagement intensity (EI) is a metric of the extent to which the company is engaging on climate change policy matters, whether positively or negatively. It is a number from 0 (no engagement at all) to 100 (full engagement on all queries/data points). Clearly energy companies are more affected by climate regulations and will have a higher EI than, for example retailers. So an organization’s score should be looked at in conjunction with this metric to gauge the amount of evidence we are using in each case as a basis for scoring. On our scale, an EI of more than 25 indicates a relatively large amount of climate policy engagement.
Relationship Score, December 2020
A new batch of industry associations has been uploaded onto the InfluenceMap system and the relationship scores recalculated accordingly.
Updated terminology, February 2021
We adjusted the terminology used to describe the queries running down the left-hand side of our scoring matrix and added additional explanatory text to the info-boxes. This has no impact on the scores and methodology. It has been done following user feedback to improve clarity.
- Details of Organization Score
-
What do the 0,1,2 and NSs, NAs mean?
Each cell in the organization's matrix presents a chance for us to assess each data source against our column of climate change policy queries. We score from -2 to 2, with negative scores representing evidence of obstructive influence. "NA" means "not applicable" and "NS" means "not scored" - that is we did not find any evidence either way. In both cases, the cell's weighting is re-distributed over others. Red and blue cells represent highly interesting negative or positive influence respectively. Full details can be found here.
- Details of Relationship Score
-
What is the Relationship Score
A corporation, as well as its organizational score will have a relationship score. It is computed by aggregating the organizational scores of the Influencers (trade bodies etc.) it has relationships with, weighted by both the strength of these relationships and the relative importance of the Influencers towards climate change policy. Full details can be found here.
|
QUERIES
|
DATA SOURCES | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Web Site
The main organizational Web site of the company and its direct links to major affiliates and attached documents. |
Social Media
We search other media and sites funded or controlled by the organization, such as social media (Twitter, Facebook) and direct advertising campaigns of the organization. |
CDP Responses
We assess and score responses to two questions from CDP's climate change information request (12.3 a & 12.3c) related to political influence questions (currently these are not numerically scored by the CDP process). |
Legislative Consultations
Comments from the entity being scored on governmental regulatory consultation processes, including those obtained by InfluenceMap through Freedom of Information requests. |
Media Reports
Here we search in a consistent manner (the organization name and relevant query search terms) a set of web sites of representing reputable news or data aggregations. Supported by targeted searches of proprietary databases. |
CEO Messaging
Here we search in a consistent manner (the CEO/Chairman, organization name and relevant query search terms) a set of web sites of representing reputable news or data aggregations. Supported by targeted searches of proprietary databases. |
Financial Disclosures
We search 10-K and 20-F SEC filings where available, and non US equivalents where not. . |
|
|
Communication of Climate Science
Is the organization transparent and clear about its position on climate change science? |
2
|
2
|
NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
|
Alignment with IPCC on Climate Action
Is the organization supporting the science-based response to climate change as set out by the IPCC? (the IPCC) |
2
|
2
|
NA | NS | NS |
2
|
NS |
|
Supporting the Need for Regulations
To what extent does the organization express the need for regulatory intervention to resolve the climate crisis? |
2
|
2
|
NS | NS |
2
|
1
|
NS |
|
Support of UN Climate Process
Is the organization supporting the UN FCCC process on climate change? |
1
|
2
|
NS | NS | NS |
2
|
NS |
|
Transparency on Legislation
Is the organisation transparent about its positions on climate change legislation/policy and its activities to influence it? |
0
|
NA |
0
|
NA | NA | NA | NS |
|
Carbon Tax
Is the organisation supporting policy and legislative measures to address climate change: carbon tax. |
NS | NS |
1
|
NS | NS | NS | NS |
|
Emissions Trading
Is the organisation supporting policy and legislative measures to address climate change: emissions trading. |
NS |
2
|
NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
|
Energy and Resource Efficiency
Is the organization supporting policy and legislative measures to address climate change: energy efficiency policy, standards, and targets |
NS |
2
|
1
|
NS |
2
|
NS | NS |
|
Renewable Energy
Is the organization supporting policy and legislative measures to address climate change: Renewable energy legislation, targets, subsidies, and other policy |
NS |
2
|
NS |
1
|
1
|
NS | NS |
|
Energy Transition & Zero Carbon Technologies
Is the organization supporting an IPCC-aligned transition of the economy away from carbon-emitting technologies, including supporting relevant policy and legislative measures to enable this transition? |
NS |
1
|
NS | NS |
2
|
2
|
NS |
|
GHG Emission Regulation
Is the organization supporting policy and legislative measures to address climate change: GHG emission standards and targets. Is the organization supporting policy and legislative measures to address climate change: Standards, targets, and other regulatory measures directly targeting Greenhouse Gas emissions |
NS |
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
NS | NS |
|
Disclosure on Relationships
Is the organization transparent about its involvement with industry associations that are influencing climate policy, including the extent to which it is aligned with these groups on climate? |
-1
|
NS |
1
|
NA | NA | NA | NS |
Open PDF file of Data Source
Open PDF file of Data Source
Open PDF file of Data Source
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
InfluenceMap Comment:
Senior executive of Nestlé France is co-president of the committee Information des consommateurs at ANIA which is a member of MEDEF
Cécile RAUZY
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
InfluenceMap Comment:
Senior executive of Nestlé France is co-president of the committee Information des consommateurs at ANIA which is a member of MEDEF
Cécile RAUZY
How to Read our Relationship Score Map
In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.
Climate Lobbying Overview: Nestlé is positively and strategically engaged with climate and energy policy, primarily in both Europe. However, the company retains memberships in several industry associations that continue to lobby in opposition to Paris-aligned climate policy.
Top-line Messaging on Climate Policy: In its Creating Shared Value and Sustainability Report released in March 2021 Nestlé stated support for global emissions reductions and ambitious climate policy in line with IPCC recommendations. CEO Mark Schneider stated clearly support for the Paris Agreement in February 2021. The company has signed on to multiple joint statements supporting a green recovery from COVID-19, such as the UN Global Compact statement in May 2020. Nestlé has also consistently called for carbon pricing in the United States, as evidenced in its Net Zero Roadmap report published in February 2021, as well as its participation in Ceres' Lead on Carbon Pricing initiative in May 2019, through which it advocated for] a price on carbon in meetings with US policymakers.
Engagement with Climate-Related Regulations: Though its activity appears more limited in recent years, Nestlé engages with positive positions on climate policies in both the EU and the US. Through a joint letter in March 2020, the company expressed support for Virginia’s decision] to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative emissions trading scheme. In July 2020, a joint letter to US Congress signed by Nestlé CEO Mark Schneider advocated for measures to support renewable energy uptake, energy efficiency, and other climate policies as part of the federal COVID-19 stimulus package. Through a joint Corporate Leaders Group letter, the company also supported raising the ambition of the EU’s 2030 Climate Target] to 55% emissions reductions in December 2020.
Previously, in August 2019, Nestlé signed onto a Ceres BICEP submission to the US Council on Environmental Quality opposing reforms to the National Environmental Policy Act that would significantly hinder GHG emissions accounting measures. In 2018, Nestlé directly opposed the repeal of the Clean Power Plan in the US and advocated for more ambitious GHG emissions standards for trucks in the EU.
Positioning on Energy Transition: Nestlé appears to have a positive position on the transition of the energy mix. A joint letter coordinated by US NGOs and signed by Nestlé in July 2020 called for various measures to transition the US energy mix, including policy to support the electrification of transportation. In 2019, as part of joint efforts with Corporate Leaders Group UK and the US Sustainable Food Policy Alliance, Nestlé advocated for policy measures to support the transition of the energy mix in the UK and the US, respectively.
Industry Association Governance: Nestlé does not appear to have a centralized and comprehensive disclosure of its industry association memberships and has not published a formal review of its alignment with its industry associations. Nestlé’s current disclosure omits key groups like the European Round Table for Industry (ERT), which is engaging on EU policy with mixed but increasingly positive positions. External evidence suggests the company is also a member of multiple industry groups with mixed positions on climate policy, including the Confederation of Employers and Industries of Spain and the Kansai Economic Federation in Japan.