Johnson & Johnson

InfluenceMap Score
C+
Performance Band
80%
Organisation Score
37%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Healthcare
Head​quarters:
New Brunswick, United States
Brands and Associated Companies
McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Band Aid, Neutrogena, Tylenol
Official Web Site:

Johnson & Johnson appear to have a limited but positive engagement with climate change regulation. They were reported in 2012 to have directly advocated for policy makers to support renewable energy legislation, and in 2010 to have stated support for cap and trade policies. However, Johnson & Johnson are members of the Business Roundtable, CEFIC and the National Association of Manufacturing, all of which appear to have negatively impacted strands of climate regulation in the United States and Europe.

QUESTIONS SOURCES Main Web Site Social Media CDP Responses Legislative Consultations Media Reports CEO Messaging Financial Disclosures EU Register
Climate Science Transparency 2 NS -1 NS 1 NS NS NA
Climate Science Stance 1 1 NA NS NS NS NS NA
Need for climate regulations 2 NS 0 NS 2 NS NS NA
UN Treaty Support 1 2 NA NS NS NS NS NA
Transparency on Legislation 1 NA 0 NA NA NA NA 2
Carbon Tax NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Emissions Trading NS NS NS NS 1 NS NS NA
Energy Efficiency Standards NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Renewable Energy Legislation NS NS NS NS 2 NS NS NA
Energy Policy and Mix NS 1 NS NS NS NS NS NA
GHG Emission Standards NS 1 NS NS NS NS NS NA
Disclosure on Relationships 0 NS 2 NA NA NA NS -1
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
16%
 
16%
 
32%
 
32%
 
44%
 
44%
 
52%
 
52%
 
29%
 
29%
 
43%
 
43%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.