Gazprom

InfluenceMap Score
E+
Performance Band
36%
Organisation Score
Modifications to InfluenceMap Scoring
Sector:
Energy
Head​quarters:
Moscow, Russia
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Gazprom is lobbying climate policy with limited, negative engagement. Gazprom appears to have taken no clear position on the Paris Agreement and in 2018 Gazprom’s Chairman, Alexey Miller, stated that “striving for a total decarbonization of the global economy is downright quixotic”. While Gazprom does not appear to communicate a position on most strands of climate policy, a statement from Gazprom’s Chairman in 2018 suggests an unsupportive position towards renewable energy legislation. Evidence suggests Gazprom strongly supports the expansion of natural gas, advocating for its role as a permanent, not just transitional, part of the energy mix, its expansion as a transportation fuel and for the global substitution of coal with gas. Furthermore, Gazprom appears to actively support unconventional oil production and the development of oil in the Arctic region.

QUESTIONS
SOURCES
Main Web Site Social Media CDP Responses Legislative Consultations Media Reports CEO Messaging Financial Disclosures EU Register
Climate Science Transparency
1 NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Climate Science Stance
NS -1 NA -1 0 -2 NS NA
Need for Climate Regulation
NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
UN Treaty Support
0 0 NS NS 0 NS NS NA
Transparency on Legislation
-2 NA -1 NA NA NA NS NA
Carbon Tax
NS -1 NS NS NS NS NS NA
Emissions Trading
NS 1 NS NS NS NS NS NA
Energy Efficiency Standards
NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Renewable Energy Legislation
NS NS NS NS NS -1 NS NA
Energy Policy and Mix
0 0 NS -1 -1 -1 NS NA
GHG Emission Standards
NS -1 NS NS NS NS NS NA
Disclosure on Relationships
0 NS -1 NA NA NA NS NA
Climate Lobbying Governance
NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.