ConocoPhillips

InfluenceMap Score
D-
Performance Band
48%
Organisation Score
35%
Relationship Score
Modifications to InfluenceMap Scoring
Sector:
Energy
Head​quarters:
Houston, United States

The engagement intensity (EI) is a metric of the extent to which the company is engaging on climate change policy matters, whether positively or negatively. It is a number from 0 (no engagement at all) to 100 (full engagement on all queries/data points). Clearly energy companies are more affected by climate regulations and will have a higher EI than, for example retailers. So an organization’s score should be looked at in conjunction with this metric to gauge the amount of evidence we are using in each case as a basis for scoring. On our scale, an EI of more than 35 indicates a relatively large amount of climate policy engagement.

QUERIES
DATA SOURCES
Main Web Site Social Media CDP Responses Legislative Consultations Media Reports CEO Messaging Financial Disclosures
Communication of Climate Science
1 0 NS NS -1 2 NS
Alignment with IPCC on Climate Action
0 -1 NA NS NS 0 NS
Supporting the Need for Regulations
-1 -1 NA NS -1 0 0
Support of UN Climate Process
1 -1 NA NS 1 1 NS
Transparency on Legislation
1 NA -1 NA NA NA NS
Carbon Tax
1 1 2 -2 1 1 NS
Emissions Trading
0 NS 0 1 NS 1 NS
Energy and Resource Efficiency
NS NS 1 NS NS NS NS
Renewable Energy
NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Energy Transition & Zero Carbon Technologies
-1 -2 NS NS -2 -2 NS
GHG Emission Regulation
0 -1 0 0 -2 -1 NS
Disclosure on Relationships
0 NS -1 NA NA NA NS
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
23%
 
23%
 
26%
 
26%
 
27%
 
27%
 
40%
 
40%
 
29%
 
29%
 
39%
 
39%
 
30%
 
30%
 
51%
 
51%
 
51%
 
51%
 
41%
 
41%
 
26%
 
26%
 
49%
 
49%
 
61%
 
61%
 
34%
 
34%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.