Climate Change

Philip Morris International

Brands and Associated Companies Malboro Philip Morris Sampoerna L&M
InfluenceMap Score
C+
Performance Band
75%
Organisation Score
35%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Consumer Staples
Head​quarters:
New York City, United States
Brands and Associated Companies
Malboro, Philip Morris, Sampoerna, L&M

Philip Morris International appear to have little engagement with climate change policy. Information on the corporate website primarily focuses on measures to increase their sustainability performance, rather than any direct legislative engagement. Philip Morris is a direct member of Business Europe, the National Associations Manufacturers and the US Chamber of Commerce, organizations that appear to be have resisted climate legislation. Details of trade association membership have been fully disclosed to CDP.

QUESTIONS SOURCES Main Web Site Social Media CDP Responses Legislative Consultations Media Reports CEO Messaging Financial Disclosures EU Register
Climate Science Transparency NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Climate Science Stance NS NS NA NS NS NS NS NA
Need for climate regulations NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
UN Treaty Support NS 1 NA NS 2 NS NS NA
Transparency on Legislation -2 NA 0 NA NA NA NS 2
Carbon Tax NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Emissions Trading NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Energy Efficiency Standards NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Renewable Energy Legislation NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Energy Policy and Mix NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
GHG Emission Standards NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Disclosure on Relationships 0 NS 2 NA NA NA NS 1
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
29%
 
22%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.