Climate Change

Boeing

Brands and Associated Companies McDonnell Douglas Hawker de Havilland Aerospace Alteon Training
InfluenceMap Score
D-
Performance Band
45%
Organisation Score
30%
Relationship Score
Sector:
Industrials
Head​quarters:
Chicago, United States
Brands and Associated Companies
McDonnell Douglas, Hawker de Havilland Aerospace, Alteon Training
Official Web Site:
Wikipedia:

Boeing appear to demonstrate misalignment on several areas of climate policy. In 2012, Boeing's CEO Jim Albaugh appears to have opposed the inclusion of the aviation sector in the EU ETS, although have instead supported a global emissions trading scheme. Likewise, although they were reported in April 2015 to have joined the National Climate Coalition which is supportive of the EPA's Clean Power Plan, previously in 2014 Boeing appear to have advocated opposition to the plan in consultation through advocacy group NEDA/CAP. Boeing have made statements in support of the need for action on climate change and about the need to transition their own operations. However, a senior executive is on the board of the National Association of Manufacturing, which appears to be actively opposing climate legislation.

QUESTIONS SOURCES Main Web Site Social Media CDP Responses Legislative Consultations Media Reports CEO Messaging Financial Disclosures EU Register
Climate Science Transparency NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NA
Climate Science Stance 1 NS NA NS 1 NS NS NA
Need for climate regulations NS NS NS NS NS NS 0 NA
UN Treaty Support 1 NS NS NS 1 NS NS NA
Transparency on Legislation -2 NA 0 NA NA NA NS 0
Carbon Tax -1 NS NA NS NS NS NS NA
Emissions Trading 1 NS NA NS 1 -2 NS NA
Energy Efficiency Standards NS NS NA NS NS NS NS NA
Renewable Energy Legislation NS NS NA NS NS NS NS NA
Energy Policy and Mix NS NS NA NS 0 NS NS NA
GHG Emission Standards 1 NS NS -2 0 NS NS NA
Disclosure on Relationships -1 NS -1 NA NA NA NS 1
Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
16%
 
30%
 
49%
 
27%
 
28%

How to Read our Relationship Score Map

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party. In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.